Read this carefully. This is the State’s Omnibus Opposition filed by ADA Lance Beal in Dwight Celestine’s case. Instead of addressing Brady violations, discovery failures, and conflicts of interest, the State labels Dwight’s motions as “frivolous” and accuses him of delaying the process. Let’s be clear. Dwight has been asking for discovery on an amended bill. His court appointed attorney refused to adopt or argue his motions. A motion questioning Dwight’s competency was filed

This is Dwight Celestine’s court appointed attorney Jarvis Claiborne. On the record, Mr. Claiborne told the court he would not adopt or argue any motions Dwight filed, even motions requesting discovery for a newly amended bill. He admitted Dwight asked him over a month earlier to file for discovery and he did not do it. Instead, without Dwight’s consent, he filed a motion claiming Dwight was incompetent and requested a sanity commission, while simultaneously stating in open c

⛔️⛔️ TOP OF THE MORNING On January 29, 2026 ADA Lance Beal the prosecutor admitted on the record that the State amended the charge against Dwight Celestine and said: “There is no different discovery. The State just amended the charge more appropriately.” Let that sink in. How can a charge be changed years later and the State claim nothing new is required? A different charge means different elements. Different elements require different proof. Different proof requires disclosu