ILLEGAL 15JDC RAILROADING
- purposedforthepeop
- Feb 2
- 1 min read
⛔️⛔️ TOP OF THE MORNING
On January 29, 2026 ADA Lance Beal the prosecutor admitted on the record that the State amended the charge against Dwight Celestine and said:
“There is no different discovery. The State just amended the charge more appropriately.”
Let that sink in.
How can a charge be changed years later and the State claim nothing new is required?
A different charge means different elements.
Different elements require different proof.
Different proof requires disclosure.
That is due process.
Dwight told the court he did not receive discovery for the amended bill.
He objected.
The court denied the motion anyway.
This is not justice.
This is not transparency.
This is not how the Constitution works.
You cannot change a charge and deny the defendant the right to know the evidence being used against him.
That is a violation of due process.
That is a violation of the right to prepare a defense.
That is a violation of constitutional rights.
The record speaks for itself.
Comments